Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France; July 2004; v. 175; no. 4; p. 331-350; DOI: 10.2113/175.4.331
© 2004 Societe Geologique de France
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Launeau, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evidence of magmatic flow by 2-D image analysis of 3-D shape preferred orientation distributions

Patrick Launeau

UMR-CNRS 6112, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique,Université de Nantes, rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes. Patrick.Launeau{at}univ-nantes.fr

Abstract

The 3-D Shape Preferred Orientation (SPO) ellipsoid can be obtained by image analysis on a minimum of three perpendicular sections, when the 2-D measurements can be assimilated to ellipses. As numerous phenomenons can modify the SPO in magma (boundary condition effects, crystal interactions, joint migrations, etc.), the ellipsoid calculation is first tested on a set of digital models of simple shear flow. Those models, made of scattered shape ratio distribution, show that a suspension of crystals in a simple shear flow of the magma produces SPO parallel to the shear direction with an intensity given by the average shape ratio of the crystals, without any link with the amount of shear flow. This steady state SPO along the flow direction is particularly useful to study magma emplacement even if it is also shown that a critical shear rate {gamma} between 4 and 8, for crystal shape ratio between 2 and 5 respectively, is sufficient to completely reorient a SPO. Therefore the SPO does not record magmatic strain as may do an enclave, which is an interface between two magmas with low viscosity contrast, that can record the whole strain of the magma by its passive deformation along the flow. An infinite strain is necessary here to parallelize the enclave on the shear flow direction. The application to a natural case (gabbronorite of the Bushveld, South Africa) shows that we must take care of the mineral chosen to describe a flow in a magma and that a careful classical study of the structures observed in thin sections is always required. To allow anyone to test the quality of the 2-D/3-D conversions, a web site is associated to this publication with a free access to all the image analysis and ellipsoid programs presented below.

Key Words: Ellipsoid • Shape preferred orientation • Image analysis • Inertia tensor • Intercepts • Magma flow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Berger, N. Ennih, J.-P. Liegeois, C. Nkono, J.-C. C. Mercier, and D. Demaiffe
A complex multi-chamber magmatic system beneath a late Cenozoic volcanic field: evidence from CSDs and thermobarometry of clinopyroxene from a single nephelinite flow (Djbel Saghro, Morocco)
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 297(1): 509 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
C.J. Archanjo, M.G. Silva, J.C. Castro, P. Launeau, R.I.F. Trindade, and J.W.P. Macedo
AMS and grain shape fabric of the Late Palaeozoic diamictites of the Southeastern Parana Basin, Brazil
Journal of the Geological Society, January 1, 2006; 163(1): 95 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Societe Geologique de France